more good rant on the topic of the day
Feb. 25th, 2004 05:41 pmBad times make for articulate anger. The format is blinding but the content is sound:
If you're going to demand the equal treatment that is your right, then you ought to have both the empathy and the cojones not to buckle when the rights of even less popular groups are at stake.
Note: borrowed from many LJs but originates here.
If you're going to demand the equal treatment that is your right, then you ought to have both the empathy and the cojones not to buckle when the rights of even less popular groups are at stake.
Note: borrowed from many LJs but originates here.
no subject
Date: 2004-02-25 05:24 pm (UTC)I'm glad I'm a product of much science fiction reading where our projected future includes chain marriages, group marriages and other departures from the ol' fashioned twosome ... a major factor in the birth of my #1 life rule: Anything goes as long as all parties are willing (before someone asks, I define willing as being able to comprehend a situation and give assent ... anybody who is incapable of that cannot truly be "willing").
What a wonderful thing legal polygamy would be ... children and aged would be looked after (because there's always somebody with a domestic streak), while caregivers would have support and relief, which would reduce abuse cases. The ability to pool incomes and resources could reduce financial and housing worries and the stress these incur ... savings on public health dollars there. Sharing of household maintenance, more REAL leisure (which translates again into lowered stress). I can think of lots of other social benefits as well ... guess it must be REALLY dangerous if it's so good for us ;-)
no subject
Date: 2004-02-25 09:14 pm (UTC)Let's not just speak of polygamy though, but also of polyandry - I'm sure there are some women who would love to have multiple husbands! ;)
no subject
Date: 2004-02-25 09:18 pm (UTC)