Jamie Lee Curtis, non-glam version - she's on a mission to de-glam herself. Given that her career depends on her looks, I'll give her mad props for sheer nerve!
Actually, considering that she's in her 40s now, she doesn't look THAT bad au naturel, does she?
Actually, considering that she's in her 40s now, she doesn't look THAT bad au naturel, does she?
no subject
Date: 2003-08-20 07:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-08-20 08:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-08-20 09:05 am (UTC)Jay Leno
Date: 2003-08-20 09:12 am (UTC)She is a very strong woman and I admire her a lot for having the guts to show her real 'me'. I always liked Jamie now I like her even more.
*G* she did say that she was worried that she would not get any more roles, but it did not take long until she did get on because of the pic's
no subject
Date: 2003-08-20 10:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-08-20 07:32 pm (UTC)I find it fascinating that of all my recent posts, this and the other one about actresses without makeup have received the most commentary. I wonder why that is? Maybe it's just refreshing to know that oh thank doG, no one is that "perfect"! It lets the non-famous masses off the hook to realize that Jamie Lee Curtis has wrinkles, large thighs, etc.
no subject
Date: 2003-08-20 07:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-08-21 09:54 am (UTC)Sad but true story of how glam affects the younger generations; when my oldest nephew was five, he was playing in the living room while my mother was taking a break and watching a taped Brit mystery. Tot pipes up to ask Grandma why none of the people on the TV are beautiful. That's a sample of how young an age all this appearance fixation affects people! Nephew turned 16 in June, so the affect age is likely much younger now ... if something doesn't change soon, we're gonna be building clinics for anorexic 6-month-olds!!!
no subject
Date: 2003-08-21 10:01 am (UTC)