Disclaimer: I like vampire novels. Historic ones, comic ones, erotic ones, crap ones - I'll usually give anything with two fangs in it a look, no matter how awful - they are my "junk food" reading. Having said this:
Evidently some conservative is trying to frame a YA vampire romance series as promoting traditional gender roles. I've not read the novels in question, but the synopsis, while sounding kinda predictable angsty teenage romance (think I will give this one a miss, despite disclaimer), it doesn't sound exactly traditional - love triangle with vampire/werewolf/human?
I think that Amanda @ Pandagon hits closer to the mark when she suggests that vampires are a tidy stand-in for repressed sexual longing, but even that doesn't get to why I enjoy the genre so much. I started reading Anne Rice at 14 and while sexy blonde vampires are exciting for the obvious reasons I always wanted to be Lestat more than be bitten by him.
This is largely because I was a stressed out teenager with little autonomy being taught to be afraid of the world, so there was real appeal in being the thing that others fear. Even as a competent adult who has long outgrown Rice, it's the power and freedom that's alluring. One of the things I enjoyed about Bloodsucking Fiends (besides the turkey bowling) was the vampire Jody's realization that she can walk around alone at night without fear.
Evidently some conservative is trying to frame a YA vampire romance series as promoting traditional gender roles. I've not read the novels in question, but the synopsis, while sounding kinda predictable angsty teenage romance (think I will give this one a miss, despite disclaimer), it doesn't sound exactly traditional - love triangle with vampire/werewolf/human?
I think that Amanda @ Pandagon hits closer to the mark when she suggests that vampires are a tidy stand-in for repressed sexual longing, but even that doesn't get to why I enjoy the genre so much. I started reading Anne Rice at 14 and while sexy blonde vampires are exciting for the obvious reasons I always wanted to be Lestat more than be bitten by him.
This is largely because I was a stressed out teenager with little autonomy being taught to be afraid of the world, so there was real appeal in being the thing that others fear. Even as a competent adult who has long outgrown Rice, it's the power and freedom that's alluring. One of the things I enjoyed about Bloodsucking Fiends (besides the turkey bowling) was the vampire Jody's realization that she can walk around alone at night without fear.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-20 12:08 am (UTC)Since the get-go vampires have stood for things you can't do in daylight. Specifically because vamps look and can pass for human but are not bound by human restrictions - social, political, sexual, etc. Plus the ultimate restriction - death.
An interesting fact that I was not aware of - the first explosive popularity of vampire literature (Victorian) is virtually concurrent with the first experiments in and eventual success in blood transfusions!
Re: blood transfusions
Date: 2008-08-20 10:40 pm (UTC)I do wonder if one of the ways people deal with new (and, I'm guessing, scary scientific progresses/discoveries) is to write fiction about them. I'm thinking of Jurassic Park and DNA cloning, or Outbreak and scary emerging diseases. Maybe some kind of coping mechanism?
Re: blood transfusions
Date: 2008-08-20 11:58 pm (UTC)my ill-formed $0.02
Date: 2008-08-20 12:33 am (UTC)The only vampire story I've read is The Gilda Stories by Jewelle Gomez
OTOH, two of my favorite show of all time, ever are BtVS and Angel. *shrugs* Go figure.
Re: my ill-formed $0.02
Date: 2008-08-20 10:42 pm (UTC)Re: The Gilda Stories
Date: 2008-08-21 02:27 am (UTC)Might also want to check out Octavia Butler's "Fledgling", as it has a sort of "extended family" relationship between a vampire and their household. Not scary at all and as ever, well written.
Re: The Gilda Stories
Date: 2008-08-21 10:15 am (UTC)I read The Gilda Stories in college, so all I remember now was that the book was about lesbian vampires. They kinda had me hooked with the premise! ;)
Re: The Gilda Stories
Date: 2008-08-21 12:22 pm (UTC)"The Gilda Stories" has been around a long time and it's a damn pity I'd not heard of it 'til now. Thanks for the rec!
no subject
Date: 2008-08-20 01:01 am (UTC)Vampires have always been my favorite of the monsters because what they offered was so seductive. Werewolves, Frankenstein, the Mummy, and the alien of the week would all just pretty much kill you. They'd eat you, vaporize your planet, or rend you limb from limb and that's it, you're dead.
Vampires can consume you but there's also the chance they they will turn you as well, making you like them, too. The males are usually always portrayed as sexually provacative (and for me, especially handsome, as they are often tall, slender, and dark haired (which are the physical attributes I prefer)).
The manner in vampires' consumption is often presented differently as well. Other monsters read, tear, and gobble; they take little time over their meals. Vampires are often presented as enjoying drinking their victims and savouring the blood and the tastes different emotions in the victims added to blood.
Victims have also regularly shown to enjoy been consumed by vampires as well. Honestly, I'd rather have Frank Langella's Dracula (1979) or Spike nibbling on my neck than have Remus Lupin on a bad full moon rip me to shreads.
Vampires have a special appeal to women because they offer power that we don't usually have. Increased strength, acceptable outlets for sexual energy (female vamps are supposed to ooze sex appeal), and becoming the hunter rather than the hunted.
Then there's that whole immortal/anti-aging thing. In a world where the older you get as a woman, the more invisible you become, keeping the appearance of youth and beauty is highly prized.
Also, in more modern lit, (as opposed to 18th and 19th cent. lit) vampires are also often used as code for "other", which can include those who don't code as "straight" and other people who identify as something other than straight white males.
Really, the whole vampire thing doesn't surprise me at all. I'm kind of surprised it's taken as long as it has.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-20 10:45 pm (UTC)Nail. Head! For me at least. It's never needing to fear for my personal safety and unapologetic being in the world that would make me wanna turn!
That, and I'd finally be able to finish my stack of books, and would never need worry about missing exciting developments in the future because I'd be too old/dead to appreciate them :P
no subject
Date: 2008-08-20 04:34 am (UTC)Otherwise the conclusion is identical, I kid you not.
I don't see Meyer's books as primarily vampire books, ironically enough, as I've covered elsewhere. It has to be said that the vampire/mortal girl/werewolf threesome has been done before, and not very long ago, but in a more adult setting, by Laurel K. Hamilton - another author who writes seemingly "fantasy" literature, but who in reality writes light erotica mixed with blood and gore.
Meyer stole the concept pretty blatantly, not that Laurel K. wrote it better.
Anyway...I'm very hesitant that you'd like these books, even if you're a vampire lover..or perhaps because of that. But if someone likes romance stories or "ever-after" concepts, then it's a go.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-20 10:54 pm (UTC)Happily-ever-after doesn't really appeal to me - never thought I'd say it about a vampire book but it sounds entirely too saccharine sweet for my tastes!
no subject
Date: 2008-08-21 12:02 am (UTC)Sookie Stackhouse
Date: 2008-08-20 04:34 am (UTC)Re: Sookie Stackhouse
Date: 2008-08-20 10:49 pm (UTC)I have seen a sneak preview of the HBO show. Looks very promising, but Bill is made more alluring than he comes off in the books, IMHO.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-20 05:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-20 10:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-21 05:49 am (UTC)Another fine'n'fun vampire book is Fred Saberhagen's "The Dracula Tape" ... the Count tells his side of the Bram Stoker story (Mr. Saberhagen has some very interesting notions about the sex lives of vampires ...)
no subject
Date: 2008-08-21 12:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-20 01:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-20 10:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-21 12:05 am (UTC)I generally enjoy Barbara hambly's writing- she's one of my fav authors (and a darn fine costumer too, but that's beside the point) I have read her sci-fi, her fantasy, and her historical thrillers and they are all really good. 'Those Who Hunt The Night' is set in Edwardian England and is very well researched. The main vampire character is a Spaniard, Simon Ysidro, who came to England in the retinue of Philip when he married Mary I and got turned by an English vampire. She gets into the psychology of how a vampire survives and why many don't. The main plot is that there is someone killing the vampries of London and the problem is that the vampires can't tell who it is. If it were a human, they would be able to detect them so it has to be a vampire.....except the killings are happening during daylight hours when a vampire can't be out. Ysidro hires/blackmails James Asher (Oxford linguistics professor and former spy) to investigate. I believe I got caught up in this book because it's an interesting plot, the history is very well done, and the vampire characters are everything a vampire should be- alien, terrifying, eccentric, and, finally, pitiful.
Interestingly, her vampires do fear. They are immortal but not invulnerable. They are hugely powerful both psychically and physically but with enough weaknesses that they stay very aware of their vulnerability.
Read the book!!!
no subject
Date: 2008-08-21 02:29 am (UTC)My sister also read them all and rightly points out that you have to read them in order or you hate Louis right off the bat because Lestat is so much more fun!
I've found the Hambly book at my library; it will go on the ever-growing list....