anotheranon: (anger)
[personal profile] anotheranon
Handmaid's Tale isn't here yet, but it's in the post (link courtesy [livejournal.com profile] betnoir) >:(

No provision for the health of the mother. If you're dying that second, your doc might be able to do something, but otherwise all bets are off. To wit: (via Feministe):
if giving birth is going to cause massive kidney damage which will likely kill her after childbirth, no exception. If giving birth is going to force doctors to perform a hysterectomy, no exception. If the fetus has such a severe birth defect that it will die before, during or immediately after birth, no exception — the woman will be forced by the state to bring a doomed pregnancy to term, and to go through the dangers of childbirth for a fetus that will never live when she could have had a safer procedure.


For the benefit of socially liberal sorts in SD (and I know there are at least two), pass around: Princeton's emergency birth control site, including how to use regular prescription BC as morning after pills, if need be.

Date: 2006-02-24 04:37 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jlsjlsjls.livejournal.com
Scary SCARY stuff! I recall coming across the announcement of this legislation last year ... guess there'll be a lot of South Dakota women paying out-of-state visits. :-(

Date: 2006-02-24 01:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anotheranon.livejournal.com
If they can :( SD is a big state - poor women who can't get away for more than a couple of daysa are still going to be SOL :(

Date: 2006-02-25 04:02 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kat1392.livejournal.com
Unfortunately, anotheranon is right. What will more than likely happen is back alley abortions or do-it-yourselfs.

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9 101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 27th, 2025 10:26 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios