picking the scab of organized religion - again

[anotheranon]

Attn: hadesgirl and patgreene in particular, 'cos I know that y'all will have some intelligent and insightful things to say:

I find this Boston Globe article, Warring With God interesting if only for this one bit:

It was unfashionable of him [General Boykin, who made the "my god was bigger than his god" noises last week] to speak aloud the implications of his "abiding faith," but exclusivist claims made for Jesus Christ by most Christians, from Vatican corridors to evangelical revival tents, implicitly insult the religion of others. When Catholics speak of "salvation" only through Jesus, or when Protestants limit "justification" to faith in Jesus, aspersions are cast on the entire non-Christian world.

This is another reason why I don't identify with Christianity, or with any one faith in particular - I don't think Jesus, Mohammed, or anyone else has cornered the market on The Way, so I find it difficult to accept Jesus Christ (or anyone else) as my personal savior, etc. when other faiths and philosophies have just as much to offer.

So I put it to those of y'all who do adhere to a particular religion - what has your religious leader got that the rest don't? And how do you respond to questions like the above, that accepting a single religious personage as The One is inherently insulting to other faiths?

Disclaimer: Despite my subject line, I don't mean this post to be insulting or condescending in any way - I am genuinely curious, and eager to start debate.

Comments

[timcharmorbien.livejournal.com]

I don't think that any one religion has got a lock on heaven, no matter what various individuals may think. Personally, I think we all have a little spark of the divine in us, and spirituality is a quest for something that best nurtures or reflects our individual piece of divinity. Your expression of spirituality could be something as simple as riding a horse down a nature trail, sitting quietly on the porch and listening to the world, taking part in a Wiccan ceremony, going to church, meditating alone or singing in a choir - - - it's not what you do that's important, but what you get out of it.

I was raised a Christian, and I still more or less follow the tenets of Christianity (with some healthy cynicism and some pagan sprinklings added to the mix), but I don't think my way of expressing my spirituality is better than anyone else's - - it's just MY way. Worshiping in a room full of people is NOT my way - - my spirituality is profoundly personal to me, and not something for public consumption - - and I always resent the implication that I am somehow less religious because I don't feel the need to congregate. There's nothing wrong with fellowship, it just isn't for me.

And enough with the 'God has a special plan for America'. God doesn't care where you live, and he doesn't like us any better than anyone else, so knock it off! :P

[anotheranon.livejournal.com]

spirituality is a quest for something that best nurtures or reflects our individual piece of divinity

Me too! </aol> Seriously - I see spirituality as an inherently personal thing. I can see how one can get a lot out of gathering with like-minded fellows, but organized religion just rubs me the wrong way. I guess it's paranoia of group=agreed upon rules=the slippery slope to dogma=original experiences discouraged.