Anyone else watching this? If so, opinions?
For those who aren't - it's another of HBO's "historical" miniseries (or is it a series?) that I've been watching 1) out of curiosity and 2) Kristen Bell ("Veronica Mars") had a guest role in an episode. At first I didn't like it (even my debauched, leathery ears cringed at the language; I think within the first episode everyone calls everyone else a c*cks*cker at least once), but it's kind of growing on me due to the evolving plot (I'm on about episode 10 of season 1).
This post (NSFW due to all the coarse language) by someone I guess is a fan alleges that while it takes liberties, the story IS based on a spectacular 19th century gold strike.
I doubt it will affect how entertained I am, but out of curiosity I'm asking the same question of it that I did of "Rome" - just how right are they getting it?
Notable that some of the linkage at the links above is from a Firefly fan site; I guess some fans are aching for another western to sink their teeth into.
For those who aren't - it's another of HBO's "historical" miniseries (or is it a series?) that I've been watching 1) out of curiosity and 2) Kristen Bell ("Veronica Mars") had a guest role in an episode. At first I didn't like it (even my debauched, leathery ears cringed at the language; I think within the first episode everyone calls everyone else a c*cks*cker at least once), but it's kind of growing on me due to the evolving plot (I'm on about episode 10 of season 1).
This post (NSFW due to all the coarse language) by someone I guess is a fan alleges that while it takes liberties, the story IS based on a spectacular 19th century gold strike.
I doubt it will affect how entertained I am, but out of curiosity I'm asking the same question of it that I did of "Rome" - just how right are they getting it?
Notable that some of the linkage at the links above is from a Firefly fan site; I guess some fans are aching for another western to sink their teeth into.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-22 11:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-25 03:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-27 01:09 am (UTC)Off-topic: I've also been enjoying the 2005 Night Stalker dvds, days prior to finding out that Sci-Fi Channel will start airing the show!
no subject
Date: 2006-07-27 11:22 pm (UTC)FWIW, there ARE some good characters to relieve the never ending a$$holery of the villians - Bullock and Star are good guys, so is Alma Garrett. Trixie wants to be good, but has troubles. Even the doctor means well.
The lack of hygiene? Well, it was the 19th century frontier...
Tangential: Wikipedia has a thorough entry on Deadwood the show linked to Deadwood the reality (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deadwood_%28TV_series%29).
Re: Night Stalker - I watched that one when it first aired and really wish it had been given more of a chance. How many episodes did it get - 6 or so?
no subject
Date: 2006-07-28 01:02 am (UTC)Sorta Off-Topic: Stuart Townsend has charisma to burn; he and Peta Wilson were the best things about LXG (League of Extraordinary Gentlemen).
Re: hygiene
Date: 2006-07-28 01:51 am (UTC)Yeah, I understand that, they just look so realistically grimy that I feel dirty after watching them! ;)
no subject
Date: 2006-07-28 02:10 am (UTC)Peta Wilson was wonderfully elegant. Stuard Townshend... is ok I guess. Something about him just doesn't light my fire.