Jun. 11th, 2009

anotheranon: (Default)
  • 09:35 RT @neilhimself: "MY LITTLE CTHULHUs". Now you can reproduce them in paper. And then they will Destroy The Earth. bit.ly/ZBftL
  • 09:35 RT @closetcaucus: One thing you can do to stop hate: Speak up when you hear hateful language. Your voice is powerful.
  • 09:36 Good analysis of the Holocaust Museum shooting by David Neiwert: bit.ly/efN6C
  • 09:37 Me, I'm reading about Lyme disease and wanting to wear hip boots up to my eyebrows!
  • 14:42 Wildlife in the parking garage. There is a bird in that nest, I swear - it flew when I tried to get closer! twitpic.com/74tb8
  • 18:20 My fabric stash: not so large as suspected, thnx.
Automatically shipped by LoudTwitter
anotheranon: (jollyroger)
Happened across this article about the Design Piracy Prohibition Act over at Final Fashion.

Like the author, I don't think I have the knowledge or background to completely comprehend what they're trying to do, but I agree that I think fashion isn't something that lends itself to copyright easily. Patterns, maybe (IIRC, some of the Fashion Workshop patterns are Vogue Miyakes, with minor changes so as not to be exact copies), but the nature of fashion is to knock off, and knock off, and knock off... besides, there are only so many ways to drape fabric on a body, and for reasons of mass production all but the hautest of couture is going to be fairly similar (shoulder seams, side seams, darts for shape, sleeves cut for length..)

What if Vionnet had copyrighted the bias cut, or Claire McCardell retained lifetime + 70 years on her use of jersey for swimsuits? Hell, where would McCardell have been without Vionnet's work?

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9 101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Aug. 19th, 2025 06:14 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios