anotheranon: (quizzical)
anotheranon ([personal profile] anotheranon) wrote2005-03-03 06:12 pm
Entry tags:

whadya mean, "ew"?!

The piercing quiz, gacked from [livejournal.com profile] tommdroid:

You scored as Dirty Piercings. AH!!! You dirty person you! Put that away!!! Who did that for you!? Your the kinkiest of the kinkiest and probably think you're hot stuff. Well, maybe you are but that's kinda nasty. Ew. Weirdo.

</td>

Dirty Piercings

90%

Tongue Piercing

90%

Cartilage Piercing

80%

Nipples

80%

Earlobe Piercing

70%

Labret Piercing

70%

Nose Piercing

60%

Belly Button Piercing

60%

Lip Piercing

30%

What Piercing Are You?
created with QuizFarm.com


A very judgmental quiz, if you ask me - I wonder how the poor creator would feel to know that I have [counts]... five of the listed holes? Feh, I say, feh!

And squeamish! Go ahead, say it - genital piercing. See, that didn't hurt, did it?

[identity profile] jlsjlsjls.livejournal.com 2005-03-04 12:37 am (UTC)(link)
***snickers*** You sound like me doing the "Shape" quiz ... wondering why not loving violence automatically made one "square" :p

I do agree with you though ... I've always figured that people who use negative terms like "dirty" in relation to genitals, sex, nudity, etc., have some problems that they really need to deal with.

[identity profile] anotheranon.livejournal.com 2005-03-04 12:45 am (UTC)(link)
I've always figured that people who use negative terms like "dirty" in relation to genitals, sex, nudity, etc., have some problems that they really need to deal with.

That's how it struck me too. Of all the euphemisms that could have been used ("naughty piercings", "private piercings", etc.) they conspicuously chose "dirty". Sad.

[identity profile] jlsjlsjls.livejournal.com 2005-03-04 12:59 am (UTC)(link)
Very sad. And yet they probably view themselves as uninhibited. ***shakes head*** A textbook case right out of John Ince's The Politics of Lust (an interesting study of sexual negativity in our allegedly "liberated" culture)

P.S. Speaking of sad, compare the U.S. cover for this title to the Canadian cover linked above. :p

[identity profile] anotheranon.livejournal.com 2005-03-04 01:22 pm (UTC)(link)
Comparing the covers - that is indeed very telling of U.S. prudery!

[identity profile] jlsjlsjls.livejournal.com 2005-03-04 11:31 pm (UTC)(link)
... or, at the very least, disapproval of raunchy Canuck publications .